There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy

1. There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Valley
2. There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Md
3. There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Mn

DOI link for There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack. Edition 2nd Edition. First Published 2003. EBook Published 18 October 2013. There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation 280. By Paul Gilroy, Houston A. Baker (Foreword by) Editorial Reviews. Paul Gilroy is one of the foremost theorists of race and racism working and teaching in the world today. Author of foundational and highly influential books such as There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack (1987), The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (1993), Against Race (2000), Postcolonial Melancholia (2005) and Darker Than Blue (2010) alongside numerous key articles, essays and critical interventions, Gilroy's is a unique voice that speaks to the centrality.

This classic book is a powerful indictment of contemporary attitudes to race. By accusing British intellectuals and politicians on both sides of the political divide of refusing to take race.

'There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack': The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation is a 1987 non-fiction book written by Paul Gilroy.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

Overview[edit]

Gilroy examines the racial politics of the United Kingdom. In particular, he discusses racism in the United Kingdom. This work of Gilroy's remains quite controversial to many for his views on racial politics in the United Kingdom and for his views on race and ethnicity.^[5]

References[edit]

1. ^'There Ain't no Black in the Union Jack!, The University of Chicago Press.
2. '^There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack': The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation at Google Books.
3. ^Prescod, Colin (1 April 1988), 'Book reviews : 'There Ain't no Black in the Union Jack': the cultural politics of race and nation', Race and Class, Volume 29, issue 4, pp. 97–100.
4. ^Lamont, Michèle, and Élot Laurent (5 June 2006), 'Opinion: Identity: France shows its true colors', The New York Times,
5. ^ ^abCheyette, Bryan (11 December 1993). 'BOOK REVIEW / Still ain't no black in the Union Jack: 'The Black Atlantic''. The Independent. Retrieved 30 March 2017.

External links[edit]

by Anthony Painter

If the riots hadn't spread beyond Tottenham, there is little doubt that we would now be having a far more heated discussion about 'race' and British urban culture, rather than a generalised moral moan. The book that many would turn to would be Paul Gilroy's 1987 classic: 'There ain't no black in the Union Jack'. In it, Gilroy outlines 'race' as an agent of historical change alongside 'class' or 'gender' (note the inverted commas). And after riots in the early and mid-1980s that were more political in their nature than those we have just seen – in the sense that there was a deliberate political point being made – Gilroy's theory of 'race' as historical agent of mobilisation was forceful. But then things went a different way.

What marks out the latest edition of the book, is its introduction. Gilroy has substantially revised his approach. In fact, he declares that race is now 'ordinary'. It has blended with poverty, material deprivation and inequality as a complex interplay of power, injustice and exclusion. Like other motivating social forces such as class, race has been shattered.

The 'rise of identity politics, corporate multi-culture, and an imploded, narcissistic obsession with the minutiae of ethnicity' have fragmented 'political blackness'. Bonds of solidarity have weakened. Rather than huddling together, the oppressed and excluded are wandering alone, facing the cold and the rain without protection. Where 'blackness' was a motivating political force a quarter of a century ago, it no longer fulfils that role.

In the conclusion to the book Gilroy quotes a young black man speaking after the Handsworth riots:

'It's not just unemployment. We're regarded as third class citizens and we're not prepared to be treated like that any longer'.

Many of those who took part in those riots show that they were not just historical agents 'in themselves' but they were also 'for themselves': they were conscious of the political statements they were looking to make. It is not for nothing that what is generally referred to as the 'Toxteth riots' is instead referred to by many of those involved or sympathetic as the 'Liverpool 8 uprising'.

That wasn't all there was to the 1980s riots. Gilroy also quotes research into riots in Bristol St Paul's. Participants describe how: 'it was lovely, I felt free'; 'people were so warm'; and 'it was really joyful, that's what they [the media] all leave out, the joy'. He notes that:

'An atmosphere of carnival engendered by spontaneous feelings of joy has been noted by many observers in different riots'.

Community, belonging, freedom and joy are not words that we would instantly associate with riots. What is striking, is the similarity between these emotions and what a young kid who was isolated and in despair may get from gang membership. Roulette 140 trick. What is equally note-worthy is the very different form that the riots in the 1980s took compared with what we have seen this time around.

Only at the start were this year's riots about race and racism, and they rapidly morphed into something else. They were not consciously political; there didn't seem to be a coming together or sense of belonging. There was a thrill impulse, for sure, but it wasn't an expression of joy and belonging. Gilroy's book alerts us to the difference between now and then.

Cultural dynamics, a social research company, has used its British values survey to analyse the value-sets that would have influenced the behaviour of the rioters. They have asked specific questions about whether someone would like to be involved in a riot, look to exploit another's weakness, be excited by social disorder, and if slighted whether they don't get mad, they get even. Some of the hottest values sets for those who would engage in riot and social disorder are defined as 'material wealth', 'power', 'control others' and 'asocial'. You find a lot of bankers in these categories too.

We are talking about status here. But before anyone gets too moralistic about it, most people pass through this value set at some point in their lives before they hit their mid-30s; though, of course, most aren't likely to engage in rioting. The riots in the 1980s mixed reckless 'joy' and political action. These riots mixed a Nietzschean will to power with social networking and designer gear's logoed outward status. A moralising message will fall on deaf ears (though it may make middle England feel good). Any attempt to mobilise social forces in the service of political change will fall like grains of sand through the fingers of an open hand.

To the extent that the solutions are political, rather than through the criminal justice system, familial or community-led, they should be focused on supporting interventions. Solutions that will establish a greater sense of worth and status of the urban dislocated: and those things must be linked to positive behaviours such as work, creativity, raising a family, or making a contribution.

There is a reverberating melancholy to Paul Gilroy's updated work. We live in a nation where the slogan 'ain't no black in the Union Jack' is neither a threatening racist chant nor an embracing anti-racist retort. It is, instead, a nation where nifty design replaces political expression as in the artist who decided to add a little black to the Union Jack. This work is still powerful, almost a quarter of century on. It is a reminder of a more political time. It challenges us with the reality that racism is far from gone in our society. Instead it's brushed over, re-designed and commercialised.

Gilroy is still angry, but sorrowful too. His core theory couldn't keep up with the shifting reality of exclusion, social fragmentation, and political impotence. The urban social movements of change he longed for and prophesised never materialised. That doesn't mean Gilroy can be discarded. He is an important and essential voice. And one that we would do well to give a hearing.

Anthony Painter is an author and critic.

Tags: Anthony Painter, Paul Gilroy, race, riots

Or perhaps it was all a fantasy, projecting all the old 19th Century ideas about The Working Class onto 'Black' Men. I lived in Brixton during the Riots of the mid ,80s & the Liberation was only for the In-group, for everyone else there was only fear.

When you talk of the present as 'less political' what you mean is less of your politics, & good riddance.

This is dire stuff. Gilroy sought to project his own political fantasies onto apolitical black rioters whose anger was bratty and childish in character, although savage in expression. They were habitual criminals who resented the police for preventing them breaking the law. Funny how other ethnic groups never had half as much bother from the police, isn't it?

Now, his predictions having come to naught, Gilroy is despondent. His supposed agents of political transformation are more interested in Nike trainers and Samsung plasma TVs than overthrowing capitalism.

Paul- you do know this is a review don't you? When you say ‘my politics', what on earth do you mean? If you mean that Paul Gilroy and I share the same politics then I'm afraid you are quite a distance from the reality.

What a funny, imploded non-discussion.
If Paul Barker thinks my antedeluvian musings are about projecting nineteenth century politics then obviously he hasn't actually read what I wrote–no surprises there then. Whatever our differences Anthony, thanks for your generosity to my old work here.

I am currently reading The Black Atlantic and Between camps I think they are interesting books to read alongside the riots that happened recently and the idea that nationalism and cultural insiderism is the root cause of too many problems in the UK.

Leave a Reply

Connected

Contact us

Contact the Editorial Team via editorial@labour-uncut.co.uk

Join the mailing list

Outside

'There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack': The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation is a 1987 non-fiction book written by Paul Gilroy.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

Overview[edit]

Gilroy examines the racial politics of the United Kingdom. In particular, he discusses racism in the United Kingdom. This work of Gilroy's remains quite controversial to many for his views on racial politics in the United Kingdom and for his views on race and ethnicity.^[5]

References[edit]

1. ^'There Ain't no Black in the Union Jack!, The University of Chicago Press.
2. '^There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack': The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation at Google Books.
3. ^Prescod, Colin (1 April 1988), 'Book reviews : 'There Ain't no Black in the Union Jack': the cultural politics of race and nation', Race and Class, Volume 29, issue 4, pp. 97–100.
4. ^Lamont, Michèle, and Élot Laurent (5 June 2006), 'Opinion: Identity: France shows its true colors', The New York Times,
5. ^ ^abCheyette, Bryan (11 December 1993). 'BOOK REVIEW / Still ain't no black in the Union Jack: 'The Black Atlantic''. The Independent. Retrieved 30 March 2017.

External links[edit]

by Anthony Painter

If the riots hadn't spread beyond Tottenham, there is little doubt that we would now be having a far more heated discussion about 'race' and British urban culture, rather than a generalised moral moan. The book that many would turn to would be Paul Gilroy's 1987 classic: 'There ain't no black in the Union Jack'. In it, Gilroy outlines 'race' as an agent of historical change alongside 'class' or 'gender' (note the inverted commas). And after riots in the early and mid-1980s that were more political in their nature than those we have just seen – in the sense that there was a deliberate political point being made – Gilroy's theory of 'race' as historical agent of mobilisation was forceful. But then things went a different way.

What marks out the latest edition of the book, is its introduction. Gilroy has substantially revised his approach. In fact, he declares that race is now 'ordinary'. It has blended with poverty, material deprivation and inequality as a complex interplay of power, injustice and exclusion. Like other motivating social forces such as class, race has been shattered.

The 'rise of identity politics, corporate multi-culture, and an imploded, narcissistic obsession with the minutiae of ethnicity' have fragmented 'political blackness'. Bonds of solidarity have weakened. Rather than huddling together, the oppressed and excluded are wandering alone, facing the cold and the rain without protection. Where 'blackness' was a motivating political force a quarter of a century ago, it no longer fulfils that role.

In the conclusion to the book Gilroy quotes a young black man speaking after the Handsworth riots:

'It's not just unemployment. We're regarded as third class citizens and we're not prepared to be treated like that any longer'.

Many of those who took part in those riots show that they were not just historical agents 'in themselves' but they were also 'for themselves': they were conscious of the political statements they were looking to make. It is not for nothing that what is generally referred to as the 'Toxteth riots' is instead referred to by many of those involved or sympathetic as the 'Liverpool 8 uprising'.

That wasn't all there was to the 1980s riots. Gilroy also quotes research into riots in Bristol St Paul's. Participants describe how: 'it was lovely, I felt free'; 'people were so warm'; and 'it was really joyful, that's what they [the media] all leave out, the joy'. He notes that:

'An atmosphere of carnival engendered by spontaneous feelings of joy has been noted by many observers in different riots'.

Community, belonging, freedom and joy are not words that we would instantly associate with riots. What is striking, is the similarity between these emotions and what a young kid who was isolated and in despair may get from gang membership. Roulette 140 trick. What is equally note-worthy is the very different form that the riots in the 1980s took compared with what we have seen this time around.

Only at the start were this year's riots about race and racism, and they rapidly morphed into something else. They were not consciously political; there didn't seem to be a coming together or sense of belonging. There was a thrill impulse, for sure, but it wasn't an expression of joy and belonging. Gilroy's book alerts us to the difference between now and then.

Cultural dynamics, a social research company, has used its British values survey to analyse the value-sets that would have influenced the behaviour of the rioters. They have asked specific questions about whether someone would like to be involved in a riot, look to exploit another's weakness, be excited by social disorder, and if slighted whether they don't get mad, they get even. Some of the hottest values sets for those who would engage in riot and social disorder are defined as 'material wealth', 'power', 'control others' and 'asocial'. You find a lot of bankers in these categories too.

We are talking about status here. But before anyone gets too moralistic about it, most people pass through this value set at some point in their lives before they hit their mid-30s; though, of course, most aren't likely to engage in rioting. The riots in the 1980s mixed reckless 'joy' and political action. These riots mixed a Nietzschean will to power with social networking and designer gear's logoed outward status. A moralising message will fall on deaf ears (though it may make middle England feel good). Any attempt to mobilise social forces in the service of political change will fall like grains of sand through the fingers of an open hand.

To the extent that the solutions are political, rather than through the criminal justice system, familial or community-led, they should be focused on supporting interventions. Solutions that will establish a greater sense of worth and status of the urban dislocated: and those things must be linked to positive behaviours such as work, creativity, raising a family, or making a contribution.

There is a reverberating melancholy to Paul Gilroy's updated work. We live in a nation where the slogan 'ain't no black in the Union Jack' is neither a threatening racist chant nor an embracing anti-racist retort. It is, instead, a nation where nifty design replaces political expression as in the artist who decided to add a little black to the Union Jack. This work is still powerful, almost a quarter of century on. It is a reminder of a more political time. It challenges us with the reality that racism is far from gone in our society. Instead it's brushed over, re-designed and commercialised.

Gilroy is still angry, but sorrowful too. His core theory couldn't keep up with the shifting reality of exclusion, social fragmentation, and political impotence. The urban social movements of change he longed for and prophesised never materialised. That doesn't mean Gilroy can be discarded. He is an important and essential voice. And one that we would do well to give a hearing.

Anthony Painter is an author and critic.

Tags: Anthony Painter, Paul Gilroy, race, riots

Or perhaps it was all a fantasy, projecting all the old 19th Century ideas about The Working Class onto 'Black' Men. I lived in Brixton during the Riots of the mid ,80s & the Liberation was only for the In-group, for everyone else there was only fear.

When you talk of the present as 'less political' what you mean is less of your politics, & good riddance.

This is dire stuff. Gilroy sought to project his own political fantasies onto apolitical black rioters whose anger was bratty and childish in character, although savage in expression. They were habitual criminals who resented the police for preventing them breaking the law. Funny how other ethnic groups never had half as much bother from the police, isn't it?

Now, his predictions having come to naught, Gilroy is despondent. His supposed agents of political transformation are more interested in Nike trainers and Samsung plasma TVs than overthrowing capitalism.

Paul- you do know this is a review don't you? When you say ‘my politics', what on earth do you mean? If you mean that Paul Gilroy and I share the same politics then I'm afraid you are quite a distance from the reality.

What a funny, imploded non-discussion.
If Paul Barker thinks my antedeluvian musings are about projecting nineteenth century politics then obviously he hasn't actually read what I wrote–no surprises there then. Whatever our differences Anthony, thanks for your generosity to my old work here.

I am currently reading The Black Atlantic and Between camps I think they are interesting books to read alongside the riots that happened recently and the idea that nationalism and cultural insiderism is the root cause of too many problems in the UK.

Leave a Reply

Connected

Contact us

Contact the Editorial Team via editorial@labour-uncut.co.uk

Join the mailing list

Outside

There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Valley

There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Md

Archives

• April 2018 (6)
• March 2018 (6)
• February 2018 (4)
• January 2018 (11)
• December 2017 (8)
• November 2017 (8)
• October 2017 (12)
• September 2017 (3)
• August 2017 (4)
• July 2017 (10)
• June 2017 (18)
• May 2017 (32)
• April 2017 (22)
• March 2017 (14)
• February 2017 (14)
• January 2017 (28)
• December 2016 (12)
• November 2016 (10)
• October 2016 (9)
• September 2016 (21)
• August 2016 (18)
• July 2016 (21)
• June 2016 (29)
• May 2016 (17)
• April 2016 (17)
• March 2016 (23)
• February 2016 (19)
• January 2016 (18)
• December 2015 (17)
• November 2015 (11)
• October 2015 (15)
• September 2015 (26)
• August 2015 (31)
• July 2015 (36)
• June 2015 (24)
• May 2015 (50)
• April 2015 (46)
• March 2015 (20)
• February 2015 (21)
• January 2015 (24)
• December 2014 (25)
• November 2014 (23)
• October 2014 (27)
• September 2014 (42)
• August 2014 (22)
• July 2014 (28)
• June 2014 (23)
• May 2014 (23)
• April 2014 (34)
• March 2014 (33)
• February 2014 (33)
• January 2014 (45)
• December 2013 (25)
• November 2013 (28)
• October 2013 (26)
• September 2013 (30)
• August 2013 (21)
• July 2013 (36)
• June 2013 (39)
• May 2013 (50)
• April 2013 (37)
• March 2013 (36)
• February 2013 (39)
• January 2013 (49)
• December 2012 (37)
• November 2012 (54)
• October 2012 (48)
• September 2012 (42)
• August 2012 (33)
• July 2012 (40)
• June 2012 (39)
• May 2012 (46)
• April 2012 (45)
• March 2012 (48)
• February 2012 (34)
• January 2012 (33)
• December 2011 (34)
• November 2011 (32)
• October 2011 (47)
• September 2011 (62)
• August 2011 (65)
• July 2011 (76)
• June 2011 (83)
• May 2011 (96)
• April 2011 (103)
• March 2011 (109)
• February 2011 (102)
• January 2011 (121)
• December 2010 (108)
• November 2010 (120)
• October 2010 (131)
• September 2010 (153)
• August 2010 (111)
• July 2010 (127)
• June 2010 (132)
• May 2010 (70)

Advertise on this site

There Ain't No Black In The Union Jack Paul Gilroy Mn

2010-2018 © Labour Uncut. This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.